8-Minute Teacher Overview

The conceptual centre of CD2 is relationship before prediction. The curriculum verb is relate, and that should remain visible throughout teaching and assessment. Grade 6 students are not being evaluated on whether they have chosen an appropriate future occupation or successfully participated in an opportunity. They are being asked to recognize an interest or skill, connect it to life roles or opportunities, and explain the relationship. What is it about this interest or skill that could matter there? is therefore one of the strongest questions a teacher can ask. This makes the difference between a surface match and genuine evidence of SP2 quite clear. “I like art, so artist” gives us very little. “I like making complicated ideas easier to see, and I am getting better at drawing diagrams. That could relate to design, teaching, science, construction planning or making instructions because all of those may involve communicating ideas visually” shows the student relating. The occupations themselves are not what make the response strong. The explanation of the connection does.

K2 gives students knowledge that helps them understand what may happen when they begin acting on some of those connections. A possible role or opportunity may interest a student while also producing the thought, I don't know if I could do that. Self-efficacy helps teachers understand that response. Beliefs about capability are task- and context-specific and are shaped partly through experience. Students do not necessarily become confident and then approach a challenge. Often a manageable attempt, practice, observation, useful feedback or experience of improvement gives them evidence from which greater confidence develops. That creates an important teaching opportunity without changing the evaluation target. Students benefit from understanding that feeling unsure does not automatically mean I cannot do this. They may not yet have enough evidence to know. Trying something appropriate may help them learn. Watching someone else, asking for advice or practising a smaller part may also change what seems possible. A student might equally try something and discover, quite reasonably, I don't enjoy this. All of those experiences may improve self-knowledge.

But trying is not required evidence of SP2. Some opportunities are unavailable because of money, distance, transportation, accessibility, scheduling, family circumstances or what exists locally. A student should never receive weaker evaluation because another student had greater access to an experience. The student who can thoughtfully explain why an interest or skill relates to an opportunity has demonstrated the central SP even if that opportunity remains completely out of reach.

This keeps the familiar Notice → Connect → Try → Learn model useful, but we need to understand its purpose correctly. Notice and Connect contain the essential SP2 work. Try and Learn extend the experience through K2 when appropriate and possible. The cycle may then feed back: trying something gives the student new information about interests and capability, which may lead to different connections next time. It is a developmental cycle, not a four-step assessment checklist.

The accompanying student post follows exactly that logic. Students first look underneath familiar interests to identify skills, then ask where else those skills might be useful. Only after the relationship has been established does the article move into How do you know if you could do something new? and Does confidence have to come first? Self-efficacy therefore enriches the learning rather than replacing the curriculum destination.

© 2026 All rights reserved.